Intended for healthcare professionals
Original research

Impact of iron deficiency on congestion and postdischarge survival in patients recently hospitalised for decompensated heart failure: a multicentre, prospective, observational analysis of the FERIC-RO study

Abstract

Background Iron deficiency (ID) is a highly prevalent comorbidity in patients with chronic and acute heart failure and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of ID and its association with in-hospital congestion and postdischarge outcomes.

Methods FiER deficit in Insuficienta Cardiaca in Romania was a prospective, multicentric study, enrolling 163 patients hospitalised for worsening chronic heart failure (WCHF) irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction. ID was evaluated at discharge and defined as ferritin<100 ng/mL or ferritin 100–299 ng/mL with transferrin saturation<20%. Patients were classified based on ID status. In-hospital changes of clinical signs of congestion and natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP) were reported and correlated with ID status. Additionally, survival analysis at 30 and 90 days was performed and compared between patients with ID+ and ID−.

Results The prevalence of ID was 54.6% (N=89) among 163 eligible patients. Patients with ID+ had more clinical signs of congestion and advanced New York Heart Association functional class at discharge (classes III and IV 58.4% vs 31.1%; p 0.002). NT-proBNP values at admission were higher in ID+ (9288 pg/dL vs 4414 pg/dL, p<0.001), with lower NT-proBNP decrease during hospitalisation (−45.7% vs −63.3%, p 0.003). Additionally, there was no difference in ID prevalence between discharge and 30 days after (54.6% vs 51.3%, p 0.782). Postdischarge all-cause mortality did not differ between ID+ and ID− at 30 days (5.6%% vs 2.7%, p 0.361), but at 90 days, it was higher in ID+ group (30.9% ID+ vs 9.6% ID−, p 0.005).

Conclusions Patients hospitalised for WCHF and ID had more residual congestion, higher absolute values and significantly lower in-hospital change of NT-proBNP. A significant difference in survival between the two ID groups emerged within 90 days of hospital discharge.

What is already known on this topic

  • Iron deficiency (ID) is a very highly prevalent comorbidity in heart failure (HF) population, with an impact on the quality of life and burden on symptoms. Previous studies did not show significant correlations with hard clinical endpoints, other than increased rates of re-hospitalisations.

What this study adds

  • FiER deficit in Insuficienta Cardiaca in Romania study was the first national registry that addressed the burden of ID in a population with worsening HF and any ejection fraction (EF) value. The prevalence of ID at discharge was high (54.6%) and similar values were reported when patients with worsening chronic heart failure (WCHF) were classified by EF. No significant differences in the prevalence and characteristics of ID were observed at discharge and 30-day follow-up. Patients with ID had more residual congestion at discharge, lower in-hospital decrease of NT-pro-BNP and worse 30- and 90-day clinical outcomes. Of ID parameters, only transferrin saturation and soluble transferrin receptors were significantly associated in binary regression model with 90-day clinical outcomes, while ferritin had no association.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy

  • ID should be actively screened during hospitalisation for WCHF, irrespective of EF or New York Heart Association class. Since the prevalence and laboratory characteristics of ID did not differ significantly between discharge and 30-day follow-up, a strategy targeting early correction of ID may reduce post-discharge event rates. Further research, considering a new definition of ID, including parameters associated with postdischarge outcomes may help to clarify the relationship between intravenous iron therapy and clinical endpoints.

Introduction

Worsening chronic heart failure (WCHF) is a common cause of urgent hospitalisations in adults.1 The 1-year mortality following heart failure (HF) hospitalisation ranges between 25% and 30%, with more than 45% combined deaths and rehospitalisations.2–4

In patients hospitalised for acute HF (AHF), comorbidities are highly prevalent irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and associated with worse postdischarge outcomes,5–7 and represent barriers to implementation of HF therapies.8 Iron deficiency (ID) is one of the most commonly reported comorbidities in HF and is associated with higher rates of hospitalisations, worse functional status, poor quality of life and limited exercise capacity irrespective of the presence of baseline anaemia.9 10

For patients hospitalised with AHF, in-hospital management relies on decongestion and initiation or optimisation of guideline directed medical therapies (GDMTs) before discharge.4 In addition to clinical residual congestion, which portends a negative prognosis, a significant proportion of patients without clinical signs of congestion may still have high NT-proBNP values or insufficient NT-proBNP decrease, suggesting the presence of haemodynamic congestion, which is also associated with poor prognosis.11 To note, some comorbidities, such as diabetes, renal dysfunction and anaemia, were independently associated with persistent residual congestion in patients hospitalised for AHF.2 Although pathophysiologically plausible, currently, there is little data to show that ID may be associated with residual congestion, either clinical or haemodynamic, in patients hospitalised for AHF. In the current manuscript, we comprehensively described the prevalence and factors associated with ID, in patients hospitalised for AHF across the entire LVEF spectrum. Furthermore, we evaluate if ID may be associated with inadequate decongestion based on the clinical signs and symptoms at discharge, aiming to confirm this hypothesis using objective parameters, such as in-hospital decrease of NT-proBNP.

Methods

FiER deficit in Insuficienta Cardiaca in ROmania (FERIC-RO) registry was a prospective, observational study, conducted in nine academic hospitals in Romania. The design and methodology of the study were previously published.12 Patients were included between March 2018 and June 2021, allowing subinvestigators to enrol patients for a maximum period of up to 8 months. Centres enrolled patients at different time points within the specified period, resulting in a longer overall duration of enrollment. During recruitment period, all consecutive patients with HF were enrolled in the study at each site. Briefly, the study included adult patients with a history of HF hospitalisation in the last year before enrollment, with signs and symptoms of HF, and increased levels of natriuretic peptides (NPs) (ie, NT-proBNP>1000 pg/mL) who required hospital admission and were discharged alive. Patients with de novo AHF, those with cardiogenic shock, acute coronary syndromes in the last 30 days, patients already on iron therapy and those with a life expectancy of less than 6 months were excluded.12

Clinical congestion assessment, including dyspnoea, lower limb oedema, altered mental status, pulmonary oedema, pulmonary rales and jugular vein distension, was performed at admission and discharge. Echocardiography was performed in the first 24 hours of hospitalisation. At discharge, ID was screened in all patients using ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT) and soluble transferrin receptors (sTfRs), and defined as absolute when ferritin<100 ng/mL and functional when ferritin was between 100 and 299 ng/mL, and TSAT<20%. Study patients were divided into two groups: ID+ and ID− based on the international clinical practice guidelines definition.4 At 30 days after discharge, full blood count and iron profile (ferritin, TSAT and sTfRs) were repeated. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin levels<13 g/dl in men or<12 g/dl in women. NT-proBNP was measured at admission and at discharge and the relative change between admission and discharge was reported.

The study was approved by the local ethics committee, according to the guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. FERIC-RO study had three study visits: during the index hospitalisation, an on-site 30 days after discharge and 90-day telephone follow-up to assess vital status and rehospitalisations for HF.

The study had an international adjudication committee (AA, SC, PSP and JB) to confirm HF as a cause of hospitalisation. The data are not publicly available currently as the existing statistical reports are still ongoing.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean±SD or percentages, and categorical differences between two groups were compared using χ2 and independent t-test; statistical significance was set at p values less than 0.05. Differences between percentages were assessed by χ2 non-parametric test. Association between ID and congestion in terms of clinical signs and NT-proBNP were assessed with Pearson’s correlation. Binary logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the association across ID and gender, anaemia, ischaemic aetiology, LVEF, presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (ie, defined as GFR<60 mL/min) and diabetes mellitus. A subgroup analysis of ID prevalence based on LVEF was performed; an LVEF<40% was defined as HF with reduced ejection fraction patients (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) when LVEF>40%. Postdischarge clinical outcomes (ie, 30- and 90-days all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisations) were presented as cumulative incidence and 30-day all-cause mortality, HF hospitalisations and 90-day HF hospitalisations depicted as Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank test for the unadjusted differences. A Cox regression model was designed to identify the existing cofounders of the 3-month rehospitalisation rate. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 26.

Results

Study patients

During the 3-month enrolment period, the centres enrolled 171 patients, of which 2 were excluded because they did not fulfil the inclusion criteria until discharge (died during index hospitalisation), while 6 patients were excluded due to no data reported, with a final study population of 163 patients.

ID+ and ID− had similar characteristics in terms of age, sex, body mass index, length of stay (LOS), comorbidities (ie, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus), atrial fibrillation, clinical parameters (blood pressure and heart rate), HF aetiology and LVEF. However, patients with ID+ had higher prevalence of renal dysfunction and anaemia. Baseline characteristics of patients are shown in table 1.

Table 1
Baseline characteristics of patients based on the presence of ID

Baseline characteristics

At discharge, ID was identified in 54.6% (89/163 patients). Of these patients, 44.9% had absolute ID and 55.1% had functional ID. As compared with ID−, ferritin was lower in ID+ (120.0±62.6 vs 261.8±263.6, p<0.001). Also, TSAT was lower in ID+ compared to patients with ID− (14.6±5.7 vs 28.6±8.4, p<0.001). The sTfR values were higher in ID+ (2.7±1.3 vs 1.5±0.8, p<0.001) (table 1). Anaemia was diagnosed in 65.2% in ID+ versus 35.1% in ID− (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in ID prevalence between discharge and 1 month (54.6% vs 51.3%, p 0.782).

Variables associated with ID

In the univariate regression model, predictors of ID were anaemia (OR 3.454, 95% CI 1.810 to 6.593, p<0.001) and CKD (OR 2.060, 95% 1.053 to 4.028, p 0.03). Otherwise, ID was present irrespective of gender—males (OR 0.741, 95% CI 0.380 to 1.445, p 0.379), LVEF<40% (OR 0.977, 95% CI 0.524 to 1.819, p 0.941), ischaemic aetiology (OR 1.228, 95% CI 0.641 to 2.351, p 0.536) or diabetes mellitus (OR 0.684, 95% CI 0.367 to 1.276, p 0.233) (figure 1).

Variables associated with ID presented in forest plot graph. ID, iron deficiency; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

Congestion assessment

There were differences in the clinical signs of congestion at admission. Patients with ID+ had more rales (51.7% vs 41.9%, p 0.212), more peripheral oedema (75.3% vs 58.1%, p 0.020), jugular vein distension (65.2% vs 45.9%, p 0.014), dyspnoea at rest (73.0% vs 55.4%, p 0.019) and acute pulmonary oedema (7.9% vs 2.7%, p 0.151) compared with ID− (table 1,figure 2). Patients with ID+ had lower respiratory variation of inferior vena cava at transthoracic echocardiography than ID− (OR 0.340, 95% CI 0.166 to 0.695, p 0.003). At discharge, the proportion of patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) III and IV was significantly higher in ID+ compared to patients with ID− (58.4% vs 31.1%; p 0.002) (table 1).

Clinical signs of congestion in the two groups at admission. ID, iron deficiency.

In patients with ID+, mean NT-proBNP levels at admission were 9288.3±7455.4 pg/dL compared with 4414.0±4843.9 pg/dL in ID− (p<0.001) (table 1). NT-proBNP levels higher than 1000 pg/dL at discharge, were more frequent in ID+ (80.2% vs 26.9%, p<0.001) and were associated with ID (OR 0.090, 95% CI 0.042 to 0.195, p<0.001). Average NT-proBNP percentage decrease of −45.7% was reported in ID+ versus −63.3% in ID− population (p 0.003), with higher absolute NT-proBNP values at discharge in ID+ (figure 3). Patients ID+ required, on average, an extended duration of intravenous therapies by 0.4 days (days with intravenous therapy in ID+ 5.4 days vs ID− 5.0 days, p 0.389), with no differences in LOS (ID+ 7.3 days, ID− 7.9 days, p 0.285).

Percentage change of NT-proBNP between two groups at discharge—graphical representation of percentage change during hospitalisation. ID, iron deficiency.

HF phenotypes

The mean LVEF was 33.03% (±15.6% SD), and HFrEF was diagnosed in 56.4% of the study population (92/163 patients) versus HFpEF in 43.6% (71/163 patients). ID prevalence according to LVEF phenotype was 56.2% in HFrEF versus 56.8% in HFpEF (p 0.941). Also, there were no differences in haemoglobin and iron profile (ferritin, TSAT and sTRF) between the two groups.

Regardless of LVEF, there are no significant differences between groups in the prescription of ACE inhibitors (43.8% ID+ and 41.9% ID−, p 0.804) or mineralocorticosteroids (59.6% ID+ vs 67.6% ID−, p 0.291). However, the ID+ group had a lower angiotensin receptor blockers (9% vs 21.6%, p 0.023) and beta blockers (74.2% vs 90.2%, p 0.007) prescription compared with ID− group. Additionally, the results were consistent with the LVEF phenotype. In patients LVEF<40%, ID+ group had a lower prescription compared with ID− group for angiotensin receptor blockers (6.0% vs 21.4%, p 0.034) and betablockers (68.0% vs 95.2%, p 0.001), while no differences were noted in the rates of ACE inhibitors (56.0% vs 42.9%, p 0.210) and mineralocorticosteroids (60.0% vs 71.4%, p 0.279) prescription (table 1).

Clinical outcomes

At the first follow-up visit, all-cause mortality was reported in five patients with ID+ and two patients with ID− (5.6% vs 2.7%, p 0.361). At 90-days postdischarge, an additional 16 deaths occurred in ID+ versus 3 deaths in the ID− group (total 90-day mortality, 30.9% ID+ and 9.6% ID−, p 0.005). There were numerically more HF rehospitalisations in patients with ID+ at 30 days that did not reach statistical significance (27.8% vs 19.6%, p 0.338). At 90 days, patients with ID+ experienced 32 rehospitalisations compared with 12 rehospitalisations patients with ID− (47.1% vs 23.1%, p 0.007) (figure 4). Overall, at 90 days, patients with ID+ had more events (combined deaths and HF rehospitalisations) compared topatients with ID− (49 events—72.1% vs 17 events—32.7%, p<0.001).

Rates of mortality and HF rehospitalisations at 30 and 90 days between the two groups. HF, heart failure; ID, iron deficiency.

In a binary regression model, ID (OR 5.310, 95% CI 2.422 to 11.641, p<0.001) and anaemia (OR 3.178, 95% CI 1.502 to 6.724, p 0.002) were correlated with clinical outcomes (deaths and rehospitalisations) at 90 days. Also, a correlation of iron parameters on clinical outcomes was assessed, significant for TSAT (OR 0.929, 95% CI 0.889 to 0.972, p 0.001) and sTfR (OR 1.774, 95% CI 1.234 to 2.551, p 0.002), without significant impact of the ferritin (OR 0.999, 95% CI 0.998 to 1.001, p 0.509) (figure 5).

Association of iron parameters, ID and anaemia with combined clinical outcomes (deaths and HF rehospitalisations) at 90 days. HF, heart failure; ID, iron deficiency; sTfR, soluble transferrin receptor; TSAT, transferrin saturation.

In addition, a Cox regression model of 3-month rehospitalisations was performed (table 2). Through the analysed cofounders, hypertensive aetiology (HR 4.645, 95% CI 1.221 to 17.676, p 0.024), heart rate at discharge (HR 1.036, 95% CI 1.011 to 1.061, p 0.004) and ID (HR 2.165, 95% CI 1.029 to 4.555, p 0.042) were associated with the 3-month rehospitalisations rate.

Table 2
Multiple Cox regression model of 3-month hospitalisations

Discussions

The FERIC-RO registry enrolled a population of patients hospitalised for WCHF, with any LVEF and various aetiologies, who were screened for ID at the end of hospitalisation. The prevalence of ID was 54.6%, with a larger contribution of the functional ID, and there was no significant difference in ID’s prevalence between discharge and 1 month (54.6% vs 51.3%, p 0.782). Similar values of ID prevalence were reported when patients with WCHF were classified by ejection fraction. ID was associated with more clinical signs of congestion and higher NT-proBNP values at admission. At discharge, compared with ID−, patients with ID+ had more severe NYHA class, higher NT-proBNP values and lower in-hospital decrease of NT-proBNP. At 90-day postdischarge, patients with ID+ had significantly more deaths and HF rehospitalisations, compared to patients with ID−, persistent after adjusted for cofounders (table 2).

Several other studies that previously characterised ID in patients with WCHF have reported similar prevalences to our results (54% in HFrEF and 56% in HFpEF)13 or a significantly higher prevalence (69% in men and 75% females).14 These findings highlight that ID is a highly prevalent comorbidity in HF, irrespective of LVEF or biological sex.

In FERIC-RO, 55.1% of patients with ID+ had functional ID. In functional ID, iron is sequestered in the reticuloendothelial system, secondary to HF-induced proinflammatory status associated with long-term evolution of HF. This is a common finding in WCHF as compared with de novo HF15 and may explain the higher prevalence of functional ID as compared with previous studies enrolling any phenotype of AHF.16 FERIC-RO inclusion criteria allowed only patients with a history of HF, thus excluding patients with de novo HF.

TSAT, as a marker of the quantity of circulating iron, remains a major diagnostic tool for ID in these patients since ferritin values are not linearly associated with iron availability and may be influenced by other confounders, particularly infection and inflammation. Of ID parameters, only TSAT was significantly associated in binary regression model with 90-day clinical outcomes, while ferritin had no association. One of the strengths of our study is the collection of sTfRs that are highly expressed in low iron body stores and are independent of inflammation. In our univariate analysis, sRT was associated with 90-days outcome (all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalisations) (OR 1.774, 95% CI 1.234 to 2.551, p 0.002).

Currently, there are no recommendations for regular measurements, although previous studies reporting a correlation of high levels of soluble receptors for transferrin and mortality17 proposed newer definition for ID using hepcidine and sTfR. The current findings support a more comprehensive approach of the laboratory tests used to diagnose ID in AHF, particularly in WCHF settings associated with persistent low-grade systemic inflammation. Further research considering a new definition of ID, including parameters associated with postdischarge outcomes, may help to clarify the relationship between intravenous iron therapy and clinical endpoints.

Demographical, clinical and biological variables associated with ID may vary according to the methodology of the research protocols, but typically these relate to female sex, advanced heart disease, high levels of NPs and markers of inflammation.18 In FERIC-RO, anaemia and CKD were identified as independent predictors of ID. CKD, as a proinflammatory systemic condition, is highly prevalent in patients with HF, reported in up to 49% of HF population.19 In patients with CKD, before and after initiation of haemodialysis, correction of ID with high doses of intravenous iron leads to a significant clinical benefit, resulting in a reduction with 44% of HF hospitalisations.20

WCHF is characterised by a dynamic evolution,1 with ‘stable’ and decompensated periods, mostly secondary to congestion, and existing evidence highlights the prognostic impact of residual congestion at discharge.2 21 Although anaemia is correlated with congestion and rehospitalisations,22 little is known about the impact of ID on in-hospital course of congestion or residual congestion at discharge.23 Our findings showed that patients with ID+ hospitalised for WCHF have more clinical congestion and more severe NYHA class at discharge, characteristics that translate into worse postdischarge outcomes (deaths and rehospitalisations).

NPs as markers of increasing filling pressure24 have distinct trajectories according to ID status. Patients with ID+ were discharged with higher absolute value and less in-hospital decrease of NT-proBNP, despite of prolonged duration of intravenous diuretic therapies. The higher proportion of renal dysfunction seen in patients with ID+ may explain the higher diuretic usage, but may be also an important factor involved in pathophysiology of ID.19 A more intense diuretic regimen, in terms of higher doses or prolonged duration, may be associated with more adverse reactions and clinicians should explore the cause of the insufficient diuretic response rather than extending indiscriminately intravenous diuretic therapy.25

The predischarge phase of hospitalisation represents an opportunity to improve long-term prognosis26, and the results of AFFIRM-AHF trial provide evidence to support the correction of ID predischarge or early after recent HF hospitalisations.27 This is probably even more appropriate in Romania, where patients are faced with limited access to ambulatory settings.28 ID should be corrected promptly and clinicians should not wait for the ambulatory phase to correct ID, in order to avoid exposure to negative effects of in-hospital congestion and to prevent clinical events occurring early after discharge. A delayed approach for ID treatment should be limited only for specific conditions (cancer, infections and systemic inflammation). This approach is supported by the current study since the prevalence of ID did not differ between discharge and 30-days follow-up visit.

In FERIC-RO, the ID+ group had a higher number of events (all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalisations) at 30 and 90 days, a finding distinct from other studies enrolling patients with chronic HF with any LVEF but lower NT-proBNP thresholds for inclusion.29 These findings underline the prognostic significance of hospitalisation for HF and might suggest that ID is not only a biological marker of severity in AHF but also a contributor to HF progression.

Our study has several strengths. FERIC-RO was the first Romanian study that addressed ID in patients hospitalised for WCHF and offered a comprehensive description of its prevalence and clinical characteristics. We identified a multiparametric correlation between the presence of ID and congestion and found that patients with ID+ had insufficient decongestion and had worse prognosis in the early months after discharge.

Limitations

This study has also some limitations. A small sample size may not be representative in a larger context, and therefore, its findings might not be generalised with other populations. It is unknown if this cohort represents an accurate view of the Romanian population with worsening HF, as differences exist between academic hospitals and smaller, local hospitals; patients appeared younger, but with more cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities compared with data from contemporary registries. As one of the inclusion criteria was being alive at the moment of discharge, in-hospital mortality during the index hospitalisation was not evaluated in the current study. Proportions of patients lost to follow-up at 30-day and 90-day visits limit the analysis of the events and insight into their clinical trajectory. Due to the non-interventional nature of the study, no intravenous iron therapies were administered during hospitalisation or the follow-up period; however, this approach was highly encouraged for each investigator after the 90-day visit. Despite several clinically relevant associations, any inference about causality remains speculative due to the observational nature of the study.

Conclusions

In patients hospitalised for WCHF, ID is a frequent comorbidity. ID was associated with persistent clinical and biological congestion and with high event rates in the first 3 months after discharge. Since the prevalence and laboratory characteristics of ID did not differ significantly between discharge and 30-day follow-up, a strategy targeting early correction of ID may reduce postdischarge event rates.

  • Contributors: CM—writing first draft; analysis, data management and guarantor. LA, CS, DB, DL, DP and DV—writing draft; analysis. OC—drafting the protocol, writing draft; analysis, data management and supervision. SC—drafting the protocol, writing draft; analysis and data management. AA—drafting the protocol, writing draft; analysis and data management. PSP—drafting the protocol, writing draft; analysis and data management. GTC—drafting the protocol, writing draft; analysis and data management; JB — drafting the protocol, writing draft; analysis and data management.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication:
Ethics approval:

This study involves human participants and was approved by local ethics committee. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Acknowledgements

This study was investigators-initiated and financially supported by Vifor Pharma, Servier, Novartis and Roche Diagnosis. However, these parts had no contribution in selecting data, analysis or interpretation of the present manuscript. Special thanks to all the subinvestigators who recruited patients for this national registry.

  1. close Tomasoni D, M, Adamo M. Worsening of chronic heart failure: definition, epidemiology, management and prevention. A clinical consensus statement by the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2023; 25:776–91.
  2. close Mebazaa O, Maggioni A. ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry Investigators. Acute heart failure congestion and perfusion status – impact of the clinical classification on in-hospital and long-term outcomes: insights from the ESC-EORP-HFA heart failure long-term registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21:1338–52.
  3. close Mebazaa A, O, Harjola V. ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry Investigators. Clinical phenotypes and outcome of patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2017; 19:1242–54.
  4. close Metra M, T, Adamo M. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur H Journal 2021;
  5. close Kapłon‐Cieślicka A, Benson L, Chioncel O, et al. A comprehensive characterization of acute heart failure with preserved versus mildly reduced versus reduced ejection fraction – insights from the ESC‐HFA EORP Heart Failure Long‐Term Registry. European J of Heart Fail 2022; 24:335–50.
  6. close Benson L, O, Crespo-Leiro M. Comprehensive Characterization of Non-Cardiac Comorbidities in Acute Heart Failure- an analysis of ESC-HFA EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2023; PMID:1346–58.
  7. close Khan MS, Samman Tahhan A, Vaduganathan M, et al. Trends in prevalence of comorbidities in heart failure clinical trials. European J of Heart Fail 2020; 22:1032–42.
  8. close Ferreira JP, Kraus S, Mitchell S, et al. World Heart Federation Roadmap for Heart Failure. Glob Heart 2019; 14:197–214.
  9. close Ponikowski P, van Veldhuisen DJ, Comin-Colet J, et al. Beneficial effects of long-term intravenous iron therapy with ferric carboxymaltose in patients with symptomatic heart failure and iron deficiency. Eur Heart J 2015; 36:657–68.
  10. close Anker SD, Comin Colet J, Filippatos G, et al. Ferric Carboxymaltose in Patients with Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2436–48.
  11. close Stienen S, Salah K, Dickhoff C, et al. N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Measurements Until a 30% Reduction Is Attained During Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Admissions and Comparison With Discharge NT-proBNP Levels: Implications for In-Hospital Guidance of Treatment. J Card Fail 2015; 21:930–4.
  12. close Antohi EL, Chitoiu GT, Ambrosy AP, et al. Rationale and Design of a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study Evaluating Iron Deficiency in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure (FERIC-RO). Rev Rom Med Lab 2018; 26:271–81.
  13. close Beale A, Carballo D, Stirnemann J, et al. Iron Deficiency in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. JCM 2019; 8:1569.
  14. close Cohen‐Solal A, Damy T, Terbah M, et al. High prevalence of iron deficiency in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. European J of Heart Fail 2014; 16:984–91.
  15. close Raffaello WM, Henrina J, Huang I, et al. Clinical Characteristics of De Novo Heart Failure and Acute Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure: Are They Distinctive Phenotypes That Contribute to Different Outcomes? Card Fail Rev 2020; 7.
  16. close von Haehling S G, Butler J. Erratum to: Iron deficiency and cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 2023; 44:1607.
  17. close Josiak K, R, Suchocki T. High soluble transferrin receptor in patients with heart failure: a measure of iron deficiency and a strong predictor of mortality. Eur J Heart Fail 2021; PMID:919–32.
  18. close von Haehling S, Ebner N, Evertz R, et al. Iron Deficiency in Heart Failure. JACC: Heart Failure 2019; 7:36–46.
  19. close Banerjee D, Rosano G, Herzog C, et al. Management of Heart Failure Patient with CKD. CJASN 2021; 16:1131–9.
  20. close White C, I, Anker S. PIVOTAL Investigators and Committees: Intravenous iron in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:447–58.
  21. close Konstam MA. Effects of Oral Tolvaptan in Patients Hospitalized for Worsening Heart FailureThe EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA 2007;297:1319. 10.1001/jama.297.12.1319.
  22. close Tang Y-D, Katz SD. Anemia in Chronic Heart Failure. Circulation 2006; 113:2454–61.
  23. close Okonko DO, Jouhra F, Abu-Own H, et al. Effect of ferric carboxymaltose on calculated plasma volume status and clinical congestion: a FAIR-HF substudy. ESC Heart Fail 2019; 6:621–8.
  24. close de la Espriella R, J, Rossignol P. Congestion in heart failure: a circulating biomarker based perspective. A review from the biomarkers working group of the Heart Failure Association, European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2022. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; Erratum in:1751–66.
  25. close Felker GM, O’Connor CM, Braunwald E, et al. Loop Diuretics in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. Circ: Heart Failure 2009; 2:56–62.
  26. close Metra M, Adamo M, Tomasoni D, et al. Pre‐discharge and early post‐discharge management of patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: A scientific statement by the Heart Failure Association of the ESC. European J of Heart Fail 2023; 25:1115–31.
  27. close Ponikowski P, Kirwan BA, Anker SD, et al. Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 396:1895–904.
  28. close OCED.
    Available: here
  29. close Masini G, Graham FJ, Pellicori P, et al. Criteria for Iron Deficiency in Patients With Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79:341–51.

  • Received: 17 July 2024
  • Accepted: 31 January 2025
  • First published: 27 February 2025